Biblio: models

This commit is contained in:
Edgar P. Burkhart 2022-02-09 16:14:38 +01:00
parent 623825baf7
commit 1a0f74103b
Signed by: edpibu
GPG key ID: 9833D3C5A25BD227
3 changed files with 225 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ of the sensors, showing that the time delay between sensors leads to a peak in
the reflection coefficient at a frequency related to this time delta.
%%% TODO? %%%
%\begin{itemize} \item \cite{sheremet2002observations}: \end{itemize}
% \cite{sheremet2002observations}
\subsection{Conclusion}
@ -170,10 +170,65 @@ should then be used to evaluate the reflection coefficient of the Artha
breakwater and to separate the incident and reflected wave components from the
measured data.
\section{Modeling wave impact on a breakwater}
\section{Modelling wave impact on a breakwater}
Modelling rubble-mound breakwaters such as the Artha breakwater requires
complex considerations on several aspects. First of all, an accurate of the
fluid's behavior in the porous armour of the breakwater is necessary. Then,
adequate turbulence models are needed in order to obtain accurate results.
Several types of models have been developped that can be used to study breaking
wave flow on a porous breakwater.
\subsection{SPH models}
Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) models rely on a Lagrangian
representation of the fluid.
\subsubsection{Porosity modelling}
\cite{jiang2007mesoscale}
\cite{jutzi2008numerical}
\cite{shao2010}
\cite{altomare2014numerical}
\cite{kunz2016study}
\textbf{\cite{ren2016improved}}
\cite{pahar2016modeling}
\cite{peng2017multiphase}
\cite{wen20183d}
\cite{kazemi2020sph}
\subsubsection{Wave generation}
\cite{yim2008numerical}
\cite{altomare2017long}
\cite{wen2018non}
\subsection{VARANS models}
\cite{van1995wave,troch1999development}
COBRAS \parencite{liu1999numerical}: spatially averaged RANS
with $k-\varepsilon$ turbulence model. Drag forces modeled by empirical linear
and non-linear friction terms; \cite{hsu2002numerical}: introduced VARANS in
order to account for small scale turbulence inside the porous media.
->
COBRAS-UC/IH2VOF \parencite{losada2008numerical,lara2008wave}: VOF VARANS (2D);
refactor of COBRAS code, with improved wave generation, improvement of input
and output data.
->
IH3VOF \parencite{del2011three}: 3D VOF VARANS, updated porous media equations,
optimization of accuracy vs computation requirements, specific boundary
conditions, validation. Adding SST model.
->
IHFOAM/olaFlow \parencite{higuera2015application}: Rederivation of
\cite{del2011three}, add time-varying porosity; Improvement to wave generation
and absorption; implementation in OpenFOAM; extensive validation; application
to real coastal structures.
\cite{vieira2021novel}: Use of artificial neural networks to determine porosity
parameter for VOF VARANS model.
\subsection{Other}
BEM: \cite{hall1994boundary,koley2020numerical}
\section{Modeling block displacement}